A design reference
Listen to an AI overview and inspect a claim
Use explanatory audio while retaining access to the source material and control of the session.
A person chooses a passage and supporting sources for an overview.
Proposed flow
- Review scope
Name verified Scripture, source authors and interpretive perspective; choose length and language.
- Generate
Show progress, cancellation and a repair route without pretending audio is ready.
- Listen
Label synthetic voices and preserve controls, transcript and source list.
- Inspect or ask
Pause to inspect a claim or deliberately enter a question branch with the same source scope.
- Return or finish
Resume at the retained position, save a named version or finish without autoplay.
Recovery and alternative routes
Generation failure retains the source selection. Missing evidence is disclosed; timecodes require reliable alignment. Source changes create a new artifact version. Download and sharing respect source and edition rights.
What counts as a complete outcome
The listener can tell interpretation from quotation and return to the original source.
Decisions within this flow
Citations in AI answers
A citation is a route to supporting material, with source type and limitations visible.
Research-informed design proposal17 · Audio and guided practiceThe player works without the screen
Support listening as a complete mode of use.
Research-informed design proposal79 · AI agency and careIdentify what AI did, where it matters
Label the actor, action and artifact at the moment they could be misunderstood.
Research-informed design proposalEngagement facets to specify
Possible situations: Learning and memorisation, Teaching and preaching preparation. These are overlapping task contexts, not fixed user categories.
Specify the chosen purpose, passage unit, pace, participation, social setting, interpretive task, environment and disclosure or teaching responsibility. Use the scenario framework.